The Copenhagen conundrum - doesn't risk/reward analysis matter?

Michael Mainelli

首页> 外文期刊>The journal of risk finance >The Copenhagen conundrum - doesn't risk/reward analysis matter?

【24h】

The Copenhagen conundrum - doesn't risk/reward analysis matter?

机译：哥本哈根难题 - 不风险/回报分析问题吗？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A bold, bold question In 2003, Denmark's National Environmental Assessment Institute came up with an initiative to evaluate the costs and benefits of alternative public-policy actions in a wide range of key policy areas. The basic idea was to produce cost/benefit analyses for ten challenges, and have these analyses rated by eight leading economists (three of whom were Nobel laureates). The idea was championed by Bjorn Lomborg, Director of the Institute, and the controversial author of the book The Skeptical Environmentalist. The Economist newspaper supported the idea and reported on a number of the challenges as well as the overall consensus in mid-2004.

机译：丹麦国家环境评估学院在2003年进行了大胆的大胆问题，提出了一项倡议，旨在评估在广泛的关键政策领域中替代公共政策行动的成本和收益。基本思想是针对十项挑战进行成本/收益分析，并将这些分析由八名领先的经济学家（其中三个是诺贝尔奖获得者）评为。这个想法是由该研究所主任比约恩·洛姆博格（Bjorn Lomborg）和持怀疑态度环保主义者的备受争议的作者所倡导的。《经济学人报》支持了这一想法，并报告了2004年中期的许多挑战以及整体共识。

著录项

来源
《The journal of risk finance》 |2006年第1期|101-104|共4页
作者
Michael Mainelli;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种英语
中图分类 F-136;
关键词
Initiative; Cost Benefit; bold faceenvironmental assessmentnewspapersEconomist;

机译：倡议;成本收益;大胆的面对环境评估新闻经济学家;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Bayes Theorem; Confidence Intervals; France; Humans; Incidence; Income; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Regression Analysis; Risk; Sex Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Urban Population;*成年人; 年龄因素; 老年人; 老年人, 80以上; 贝叶斯定理; 置信区间; 法国; 发病率; 收入; 肺肿瘤; 回归分析; 危险; 性别因素; 社会经济因素; 市区人口 [J] . Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation . 2009,第8期

机译：Bayes Theorem; Confidence Intervals; France; Humans; Incidence; Income; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Regression Analysis; Risk; Sex Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Urban Population;*成年人; 年龄因素; 老年人; 老年人, 80以上; 贝叶斯定理; 置信区间; 法国; 发病率; 收入; 肺肿瘤; 回归分析; 危险; 性别因素; 社会经济因素; 市区人口
2. Comment on 'Developing Policy in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty: Interpreting 0.3 μT or 0.4 μT Cutpoints from EMF Epidemiologic Studies' by Kheifets et al. in Risk Analysis, 25(4), 927-935 [J] . Michael J. OCarroll, Denis L. Henshaw Risk analysis . 2007,第2期

机译：评论Kheifets等人的“面对科学不确定性制定政策：从EMF流行病学研究中解释0.3μT或0.4μT临界点”。 in Risk Analysis，25（4），927-935
3. Comment on 'Developing Policy in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty: Interpreting 0.3 μT or 0.4 μT Cutpoints from EMF Epidemiologic Studies' by Kheifets et al. in Risk Analysis, 25(4), 927-935 [J] . Michael Kundi Risk analysis . 2006,第3期

机译：评论Kheifets等人的“面对科学不确定性制定政策：从EMF流行病学研究中解释0.3μT或0.4μT临界点”。 in Risk Analysis，25（4），927-935
4. Risk analysis of Tangjiashan landslide dam [C] . Ming Peng, Limin Zhang, Runqiu Huang Advances in analysis, modeling design . 2010

机译：risk analysis of tang假山landslide dam
5. 中国跨地域人群风险偏好对海外投资的影响分析 =A Cross-Regional Analysis on Impact of Risk Appetite for Oversea Investment of Chinese Population [D] . Wan, Jianyin. 2019

机译：中国跨地域人群风险偏好对海外投资的影响分析 =A Cross-Regional Analysis on Impact of Risk Appetite for Oversea Investment of Chinese Population
6. Zur Reform des IAS 17: Ist der Right-of-Use-Approach dem Risk-Reward-Approach ufcberlegen? [O] . Hartmann-Wendels Thomas 2010

机译：Zur Reform des Ias 17：Ist der Right-of-Use-approach dem Risk-Reward-approach ufcberlegen？

The Copenhagen conundrum - doesn't risk/reward analysis matter?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅