...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >LETTER OF THE WEEK - Having a named GP is not enough
【24h】

LETTER OF THE WEEK - Having a named GP is not enough

机译:本周的信 - 拥有指定的GP还不够

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mahase reports on research by Tammes et al showingthat having named doctors in general practice is not effective (This Week, 28 September). This is not surprising, as without further interventions it remains an administrative process only. Simply allocating the name of a GP to patients, as general practices are required to do by contract, does nothingto foster or improve continuity. This has been shown before by Barker et al. Usingthe same dataset, this group also showed that patients who received higher continuity of GP care had a 12.5% reduction in hospital admissions.
机译:Mahase关于Tammes等人在一般实践中任命医生的研究的报告无效(本周,9月28日)。 这并不奇怪,因为没有进一步的干预措施,它仍然只是一个行政过程。 只需将全科医生的名称分配给患者,因为必须通过合同进行一般实践,这无助于促进或改善连续性。 Barker等人之前已经显示了这一点。 使用同一数据集,该组还表明,接受GP护理连续性更高的患者的住院率降低了12.5%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号