• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology Public Policy and Law >The Effects of Variations in Confession Evidence and Need for Cognition on Jurors' Decisions
【24h】

The Effects of Variations in Confession Evidence and Need for Cognition on Jurors' Decisions

机译：认罪证据和认知需求对陪审员决定的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The reliability of a confession partially depends on the interrogation methods used and the confession's content. Confronting suspects with evidence gives a suspect knowledge of nonpublic details, increasing the likelihood of a false confession (Gudjonsson & Pearse, 2011; Leo, 2009), and makes the confession harder to judge as more or less reliable. That is, if a confession is consistent with case facts but details of the crime were communicated to the suspect during interrogation, it is difficult to judge whether the confession is a product of the suspect's knowledge of the crime or the details that were communicated during the interrogation. The objective of this article was to examine whether jurors consider the interrogation technique and source of consistent knowledge in judging the reliability of confession evidence. In 2 studies, participants read a trial summary in which the defendant's confession was consistent versus inconsistent with case facts and evidence was withheld versus disclosed during the interrogation. In Study 2, we also examined for moderating effects of need for cognition (NC). Overall, participants were attuned to confession-case facts consistency in making decisions; furthermore, in Study 2, this effect interacted with evidence disclosure on a number of measures. If the confession was consistent, participants rated the strength of evidence and reliability of the confession higher, and impression of the interrogation more positively, when evidence was withheld during the interrogation rather than disclosed. NC did not moderate these effects. Overall, findings suggest participants are somewhat sensitive to variations in confession evidence.
机译：供认的可靠性部分取决于所使用的审讯方法和供认的内容。面对证据的嫌疑犯使嫌疑犯了解非公开细节，增加了虚假认罪的可能性（Gudjonsson＆Pearse，2011; Leo，2009年），并使认罪更难判断为或多或少可靠。也就是说，如果认罪与案件事实一致，但是在讯问期间将犯罪的细节传达给了嫌疑人，那么很难判断供认是犯罪嫌疑人对犯罪的知识的产物，还是在审讯过程中传达的。审讯。本文的目的是检查陪审员是否考虑审讯技术和一致知识的来源来判断认罪证据的可靠性。在两项研究中，参与者阅读了一项审判摘要，其中被告的供词是一致的，与案件事实不一致，证据与审讯期间披露相对于披露。在研究2中，我们还检查了认知需求（NC）的调节作用。总体而言，参与者在做出决策时被调整为认罪事实的一致性。此外，在研究2中，这种效果与许多措施的证据披露相互作用。如果供认是一致的，那么当参与者将供认的证据和可靠性的力量评为更高的证据和可靠性，并在审讯期间被删除而不是披露时，对审讯的印象更为积极。 NC没有缓解这些影响。总体而言，调查结果表明，参与者对认罪证据的变化有些敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号