首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cognitive enhancement >Increasing Working Memory in Young Healthy Adults: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multifaceted Brain Training Intervention
【24h】

Increasing Working Memory in Young Healthy Adults: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multifaceted Brain Training Intervention

机译:增加健康成年人的工作记忆:一项多面脑训练干预措施的簇随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A cluster randomized controlled trial enrolled 2389 healthy students with the objective to test the effectiveness of a commercially developed multifaceted brain training intervention. Students were recruited from 17 Danish upper secondary education schools and were enrolled in one of three conditions: (1) multifaceted brain training intervention (MBT), (2) active control assigned to dual-n-back combined with light physical activity (AC), and (3) passive control (PC). Randomization was completed at class level, and number of classes was 99. The training volume was matched between the two active groups of the study and amounted to 1 h per week for 12 weeks. Hierarchical mixed regression models were used to analyze the data. No significant effects of MBT were found on the primary outcome measures of visual and verbal working memory. On secondary outcome measures including sustained attention, well-being, mindset, and sleep quality, no significant effects were observed. Supplementary, sensitivity analyses including only the classes, where the implementation was deemed successful, were conducted, revealing a single significant finding in relation to sleep quality, but not leading to a change in the overall results. Planned subgroup analysis did not show convincing differential effects of students with high versus low intelligence, with or without ADHD, growth mindset versus fixed mindset.
机译:一项群集随机对照试验招募了2389名健康学生,目的是测试商业开发的多方面脑训练干预措施的有效性。从17所丹麦高中教育学校招募学生,并在三个条件之一中招募:(1)多面脑训练干预措施(MBT),(2)分配给双N-BACK的主动控制与轻体活动(AC)结合在一起(AC) ,和(3)被动控制(PC)。随机分配在课程水平上完成,课程数为99。训练量是研究的两个活性组之间的匹配,每周1小时,持续12周。分层混合回归模型用于分析数据。没有发现MBT对视觉和言语工作记忆的主要结果度量的显着影响。关于次要结果措施,包括持续的关注,福祉,心态和睡眠质量,没有观察到显着影响。进行了补充,敏感性分析,包括仅进行实施成功的类别,揭示了与睡眠质量有关的一个重要发现,但并没有导致整体结果的变化。计划的亚组分析并未表明具有高智力与低智力,有或没有多动症的学生,成长心态与固定心态的学生的差异影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号