• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cognitive enhancement >Comparing the Efficacy of Four Brief Inductions in Boosting Short-Term Creativity
【24h】

Comparing the Efficacy of Four Brief Inductions in Boosting Short-Term Creativity

机译：比较四个简短归纳在提高短期创造力方面的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Augmenting creative performance has the potential to benefit both the individual and our society. Several studies have evaluated the impact of different behavioral training or induction methods on creativity. However, the findings are mixed and sometimes contradictory. Four different short-term induction methods which differed along two information processing dimensions—modality and demand—were compared within a single experimental paradigm alongside a non-induction control group to determine which was the most effective at improving creativity. A comparison on the experimental inductions revealed that low-demand induction methods boosted creativity more than high-demand induction methods. However, this pattern was not maintained when comparisons included the non-induction control. These findings provide insights on important?factors and control variables that need to be taken into account at the level of experimental design in order to be able to evaluate the efficacy of different induction and training methods on creativity.
机译：增强创造性表现有可能使个人和我们的社会受益。几项研究评估了不同的行为训练或诱导方法对创造力的影响。但是，这些发现是混杂的，有时是矛盾的。在单个实验范式中与非诱导对照组一起，在两个信息处理维度（模样和需求）沿两个信息处理维度（模样和需求）有所不同，以确定哪些最有效地提高创造力。对实验归纳的比较表明，低需求诱导方法比高需求诱导方法更具创造力。但是，当比较包括非诱导对照时，这种模式并不能保持这种模式。这些发现提供了有关重要因素和控制变量的见解，这些变量需要在实验设计水平上考虑到，以便能够评估不同诱导和培训方法对创造力的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号