• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water >Swimming alone? Why linking flood risk perception and behavior requires more than “it's the individual, stupid”
【24h】

Swimming alone? Why linking flood risk perception and behavior requires more than “it's the individual, stupid”

机译：独自游泳？ 为什么将洪水风险感知和行为联系起来不仅仅需要“是个体，愚蠢”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract A common assertion in discussions of flooding is that risk perception is critical and is linked to risk‐mitigating behavior. Furthermore, many assert that the adverse effects of floods could be reduced by changes in risk communication, thereby influencing risk perception to foster mitigating behavior. We argue that these assertions are based on quite questionable underlying assumptions: That stakeholders are generally aware of flood risk, that they have the capacity to engage in disaster risk reduction, and that their actions can be effective. The belief in and policies influenced by these three questionable assertions support, in turn, policies that shift responsibility for flood risk reduction onto individuals and homeowners, without regard for social and spatial justice issues. In contrast, we argue that context matters to understanding the complexity of the relation between flood risk perception and behavior, local power relations, and other constraints and opportunities that affect stakeholders. While the academic community has long played a pivotal role in supporting practical flood risk management, future research should take a more critical perspective on the underlying assumptions and focus on improving coordination across theories, methods, and variables, fostering comparative studies across disciplines, contexts, and scales. This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Planning Water Human Water > Water as Imagined and Represented Science of Water > Water Extremes
机译：摘要在讨论洪水的讨论中，风险感知至关重要，并且与风险提出的行为有关。此外，许多人断言，风险交流的变化可能会减少洪水的不利影响，从而影响风险感知以促进缓解行为。我们认为这些断言是基于非常可疑的基本假设：利益相关者通常知道洪水风险，他们有能力减少灾害风险，并且他们的行动可以有效。受到这三个可疑断言的影响和政策的信念和政策反过来，反过来，将洪水风险降低责任的政策转移到了个人和房主上，而无需考虑社会和空间司法问题。相反，我们认为上下文对于理解洪水风险感知与行为，地方权力关系以及其他影响利益相关者的限制和机会之间关系的复杂性很重要。尽管学术界长期以来一直在支持实际的洪水风险管理方面发挥了关键作用，但未来的研究应对基本假设有更批判的看法，并专注于改善跨理论，方法和变量的协调，从而促进跨学科，环境，环境，环境，环境，环境，环境，背景，，，和秤。本文分类为：工程水>规划水人水>如有想象的水和代表水科学>极端水

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号