...
首页> 外文期刊>Vision Research: An International Journal in Visual Science >Non-canonical reading: reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle (2008).
【24h】

Non-canonical reading: reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle (2008).

机译:非传统阅读:回复Rayner,Pollatsek,Liversedge和Reichle(2008)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle offer a spirited critique of our paper (Kennedy & Pynte, 2008). Their argument is that our data were obtained selectively, that the effects reported are not typical of normal reading and, in any case, do not pose particularly severe theoretical problems for serial models of reading like E-Z Reader. In this rebuttal we follow the organisation of their Comment and deal with three issues: (1) the nature of the phenomena; (2) the degree to which these represent a genuine challenge to current models of eye movement control; and (3) the relationship between empirical data and computational models in this domain.
机译:Rayner,Pollatsek,Liversedge和Reichle对我们的论文提供了充满活力的批评(Kennedy&Pynte,2008年)。 他们的论点是我们的数据是有选择地获得的,报道的效果不是正常阅读的典型代表,无论如何,对于像E-Z读取器这样的读取的串行模型而言,不会构成特别严重的理论问题。 在这一反驳中,我们遵循他们的评论的组织,并处理三个问题:(1)现象的性质; (2)这些代表目前眼动控制模型的真正挑战的程度; (3)该域中的经验数据与计算模型之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号