• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of behavioural science >Measuring Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise: A Tale of Two Instruments
【24h】

Measuring Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise: A Tale of Two Instruments

机译：衡量运动中的心理需求满意度：两种乐器的故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives: Grounded in Basic Psychological Needs Theory (BPNT; Ryan and Deci, Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness, Guilford Press, 2017), this investigation synthesized and evaluated score reliability estimates produced by the Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise (PNSE) Scale and the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale (BPNES). A reliability generalization (RG) approach was employed to address these questions: (a) What is the typical reliability coefficient for scores generated by using the PNSE or BPNES? and (b) What (if any) factors impact score reliability estimates across studies using the PNSE and BPNES? Research Design: This study used archival data within a nonexperimental research design. Methods: Electronic database and manual searches guided by keywords plus inclusion/exclusion criteria identified 68 published articles using either the PNSE or BPNES that reported estimates of score reliability. Moderator analyses were conducted using instrument and sample characteristics to address factors that could impact score reliability for both instruments. Results: Mean score reliability estimates for the PNSE and BPNES exceeded 0.81 across published studies using either instrument. On average, the lowest score reliability estimates were evident for the BPNES-Autonomy subscale. Moderator analyses revealed instrument-specific effects for select instruments and/or sample characteristics on score reliability estimates. Conclusions: Overall, the limited error of measurement is evident based on average score reliability estimates for the PNSE and BPNES. Interpretation of the moderator analyses reinforces the importance of understanding the role of sampling and instrument modification on score reliability in exercise psychology research using the PNSE and BPNES.
机译：目标：基于基本心理需求理论（BPNT; Ryan和Deci，自决理论：动机，发展和健康中的基本心理需求在运动（PNSE）量表和运动规模（BPNE）中的基本心理需求中。采用可靠性概括（RG）方法来解决这些问题：（a）使用PNSE或BPNES生成的分数的典型可靠性系数是什么？ （b）使用PNSE和BPNE的研究影响分数的可靠性估计值（如果有）有什么影响？研究设计：本研究在非实验性研究设计中使用了档案数据。方法：由关键字和包含/排除标准指导的电子数据库和手动搜索，使用PNSE或BPNES确定了68个已发布的文章，这些文章报告了分数可靠性的估计值。使用仪器和样品特征对主持人分析进行了分析，以解决可能影响两种仪器的得分可靠性的因素。结果：使用这两种仪器，PNSE和BPNE的平均得分可靠性估计值超过了0.81。平均而言，BPNES-AUTOMONY子量表的得分可靠性估计值最低。主持人分析揭示了针对分数可靠性估计值的精选仪器和/或样品特征的仪器特异性效应。结论：总体而言，根据PNSE和BPNE的平均得分可靠性估计值，测量的有限误差是明显的。主持人分析的解释增强了使用PNSE和BPNES在运动心理学研究中进行抽样和仪器修改对分数可靠性的作用的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号