...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Otology and neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology >Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
【24h】

Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.

机译：基于导电或混合听力损失患者的骨整合植入物的声音处理器的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVES: : To compare the patient benefit of the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid (Baha) Divino and the Baha BP100 sound processors. STUDY DESIGN: : Prospective experimental study. SETTING: : Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: : Twenty experienced Baha Divino users with conductive or mixed hearing loss. INTERVENTIONS: : Speech understanding in quiet and in noise was measured in unaided conditions and with the subjects' own Divino sound processors. Speech in noise was tested with the noise arriving either from the front or from the back of the subjects. Then, participants were fitted with BP100 sound processors. After 3 months of use, all speech tests were repeated with the new sound processor along with a subset of the tests from the first session to assess learning or training effects. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaires were administered at 0 and at 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: : Aided speech understanding in quiet and in noise. RESULTS: : No significant differences were found between the two devices regarding speech understanding in quiet. Speech understanding in noise was improved, on average, by +1.0 to +2.3 dB with the BP100 when compared to the Divino. No significant learning effects were found. Subjective ratings assessed by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire showed statistically significantly better scores for the BP100 for noisy or reverberant environments, when compared with the Divino. CONCLUSION: : The performance of both devices is similar for speech understanding in quiet. Speech understanding in noise is significantly better with the Baha BP100 than with the Baha Divino, presumably as a result of the improved signal processing.
机译：目标：：比较骨锚助听器（Baha）Divino和Baha BP100声音处理器的患者益处。研究设计：：前瞻性实验研究。设置：：三级推荐中心。患者：：有导电或混合听力损失的二十个经验丰富的巴哈Divino使用者。干预措施：：在静静和噪音中的语音理解是在独立的条件和受试者自己的Divino声音处理器中衡量的。测试了噪声中的语音，并从受试者的前部或后部到达噪声。然后，将参与者配备BP100声音处理器。使用3个月后，与新的声音处理器一起重复所有语音测试，以及第一届会议中的一部分测试，以评估学习或培训效果。助听器福利（APHAB）问卷的缩写概况在0和3个月时给予。主要结果度量：：安静和噪音中的辅助语音理解。结果：：这两个设备之间在安静中没有发现有关语音理解的显着差异。与Divino相比，BP100的噪声中的语音理解平均提高了+1.0至+2.3 dB。找不到明显的学习效果。与Divino相比，通过助听器益处（APHAB）问卷评估的主观评分（APHAB）问卷显示，噪音或混响环境的BP100得分明显更好。结论：：这两个设备的性能对于安静的语音理解都是相似的。 Baha BP100在噪声中的语音理解要比Baha Divino要好得多，这可能是由于改善的信号处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号