• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology of violence >Associations of Bullying and Sexual Harassment With Student Well-Being Indicators
【24h】

Associations of Bullying and Sexual Harassment With Student Well-Being Indicators

机译：欺凌和性骚扰与学生福祉指标的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: Although both school bullying and sexual harassment have been widely studied, there is little research comparing their prevalence and impact within a single sample. The present study investigated three research questions: (a) What is the prevalence of bullying compared with sexual harassment in high school, and how does prevalence differ across gender, grade, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status? (b) How is bullying associated with student well-being indicators, as compared with sexual harassment? (c) What is the association of just a single experience of sexual harassment with student distress? Method: A statewide survey of 85,750 students (Grades 9-12) in 322 high schools reported how many times in the past school year they had experienced different types of bullying and sexual harassment. Participants also reported about mental health, risk behaviors, academic achievement, student engagement, and feelings of safety. Results: Sexual harassment was slightly more prevalent than bullying, but both demonstrated meaningful associations with student well-being indicators. Even a single experience of sexual harassment was associated with higher student distress, with experiences of sexual rumors being the most distressing. Conclusions: Researchers should be aware that bullying and sexual harassment are prevalent in schools and associated with negative well-being indicators. Attention to either alone would not yield an adequate assessment of adolescent victimization experiences, and prevention efforts should consider both forms of aggression to provide safer, healthier learning environments for students.
机译：目的：尽管对学校欺凌和性骚扰都进行了广泛的研究，但几乎没有研究比较它们在单个样本中的患病率和影响。本研究调查了三个研究问题：（a）与高中的性骚扰相比，欺凌的普遍性是什么？在性别，等级，种族/种族和社会经济地位的流行率如何？ （b）与性骚扰相比，欺凌与学生福祉指标有何关系？ （c）只有一次性骚扰与学生困扰的一次经历的联系是什么？方法：在322所中学中对85,750名学生（9 - 12年级）的全州调查报告，在过去的学年中，他们经历了不同类型的欺凌和性骚扰。参与者还报告了心理健康，风险行为，学术成就，学生参与度和安全感。结果：性骚扰比欺凌行为略多，但两者都表现出与学生福祉指标的有意义的联系。即使是一次性骚扰的经历也与学生的痛苦更高有关，性谣言的经历最令人痛苦。结论：研究人员应意识到，欺凌和性骚扰在学校中普遍存在，并且与负面的福祉指标有关。仅关注任何一项，都不会对青少年受害经历进行充分的评估，而预防努​​力应考虑两种形式的侵略，以为学生提供更安全，更健康的学习环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号