首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Inquiry >Flipping Methodology: Or, Errancy in the Meanwhile and the Need to Remove Doors
【24h】

Flipping Methodology: Or, Errancy in the Meanwhile and the Need to Remove Doors

机译:与此同时翻转方法:或者,错误需要删除的大门

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article ponders two questions:1. What does "postqualitative" mean to you?2. Why do you think the "postqualitative" movement is important to the field of qualitative inquiry?In response, it poses a method/ology of errancy-a flipping methodology-that locates postqualitative research as an ethico-onto-epistemological political project of opening theory-practice spaces for differential matterings. Postqualitative flipping is not an individual undertaking, it is an ecology of practices, a resonation across bodies, a navigating of movement for a politics of change, in which even barely perceptible shifts possibilize new modes of thinking and unthinking, doing and undoing.
机译:本文思考两个问题:1。“postqualitative”对你意味着什么? 2。“postqualitative”运动是很重要的定性调查的领域吗?提出了一个方法/ errancy-a抛的学问方法,定位postqualitative研究作为一个ethico-onto-epistemological政治项目的理论实践空间微分产生关系。并不是一个个人的任务,它是一个生态实践,跨机构振动,导航的政治运动改变,甚至几乎察觉不到的变化possibilize新的思维模式和盲目,做和毁灭。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号