• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Wissenschaftsrecht >Das Hochschulstudium und seine Kosten
【24h】

Das Hochschulstudium und seine Kosten

机译：当地的大学和成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As a result of the nullification of S 27IV HRG (a federal framework'faw on higher education) by the Federal Constitutional Court, the prohibition to charge tuition fees for studying for a first degree at a German university was lifted. Therefore it is now for the individual federal states to decide whether they wish to introduce tuition fees or not. Fees for "normal" first degree students do not, as a rule, infringe the Constitution, provided that their height is appropriate and does thus not keep anyone from beginning their studies. This is also true for the federal state of Hesse, although Art. 59 H V (Hessian Constitution) states a general ban on school or tuition fees. Unlike these general tuition fees, special fees for long-term students have already since a few years been introduced by several federal states. They may - at least in Hesse - infringe the constitutional rights of the students concerned if the hardship clauses are insufficient or if the general exclusion of retroactive effects is not respected. A third category of tuition fees are those which are charged for studying for a second degree after having finished or given up a first subject. The way these fees are regulated in Hesse, they can also have unallowed retroactive effects or infringe the principle of equal treatment, which is guaranteed by Art. 3 I GG (Basic Law), because the criteria which are used for differentiating between certain groups of students are partly inappropriate. Finally, S 64a HHG (the Hessian law on higher education) makes the students pay a contribution to the university's administrative costs. In its current form, this regulation is unconstitutional. Firstly, the Hessian parliament did not have the legislative authority to pass this law because there is no reasonable balance between the amount to pay and the service rendered in return. This disproportion secondly violates the students' fundamental rights stated in Art. 121 GG (the freedom to choose a career) or at least in Art. 2 I GG (the general freedom of action).
机译：由于年代27 iv HRG(的无效联邦高等教育框架'faw)联邦宪法法院禁止收取学费学习第一德国大学学位是解除。因此,现在对个人联邦国家决定他们是否愿意介绍学费。学位的学生不这样做,作为一个规则,侵犯宪法,提供他们的身高适当的,因此不阻止任何人开始他们的研究。黑森州的联邦国家,虽然艺术。59 H V(黑森宪法)国家一般禁止学校或学费。为长期学生学费、特殊费用以来已经几年了几个联邦州。Hesse——宪法权利的侵犯学生担心如果困难条款不足或者一般的排除追溯影响并不尊重。类别的学费是那些收费后攻读第二学位在完成或放弃第一个话题。这些费用的监管方式在汉森,他们可以也有不允许的追溯或影响侵犯平等对待的原则,保证了艺术。3我GG(基本法),因为用于区分的标准某些群体的学生之间的部分不合适的。法律高等教育)让学生支付对大学管理的贡献成本。违反宪法的。没有立法机关通过了吗因为没有合理的平衡支付金额和服务之间的关系呈现的回报。违背了学生的基本权利121年艺术。GG(选择职业的自由)或者至少在艺术。2我GG(一般的自由的行动)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号