...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nordic Journal of Botany >The role of the Weberian Reform in European Rubus research and the taxonomy of locally distributed species - which species should we describe?
【24h】

The role of the Weberian Reform in European Rubus research and the taxonomy of locally distributed species - which species should we describe?

机译：在欧洲悬钩子属植物的作用韦伯式的改革研究和局部分布的分类我们应该描述物种,物种呢?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

After Sudre published his treatment of European Rubi in the early 20th century, Rubus taxonomy in Europe suffered from a scholastic phase and a longer period of stagnation. The so-called 'Weberian Reform' initiated the necessary revival of European batology. It rests on four major pillars: 1) mapping projects over larger areas, 2) evaluation of type material, 3) visits to loci classici, and 4) evaluation of the status of species by means of their distribution areas. Subsequently, it has become widelyaccepted in European batology that only species with a distribution area over 50 km should be described. Although this pragmatic species concept has been useful in making~a continent-wide overview of brambles, we argue that it is lacking a scientific basis, and should thus be rejected.There are at least four distinctive problems when treating locally distributed brambles: 1) primary hybrids, 2) locally distributed stabilised apomicts, 3) intraspecific variation in species with a larger distribution range, and 4) unstabilised swarms ofhybridogenic biotypes and the derivates thereof (mainly in the montane regions). When facing the problems in Rubus systematics, we argue that all independently evolving lineages should be described as species, including apomictic lineages with very small distribution ranges, both from the mountain-dwelling glandular series and from the lowlands. Neither primary hybrids (which are not stabilised by apomixis), nor biotypes without an independent and coherent distribution area are independendy evolving lineages, and should thus not be described as species. We advocate a restrained attitude when describing new species with limited distribution areas.
机译：欧洲Sudre后发表了他的治疗Rubi在20世纪早期,悬钩子属植物分类欧洲遭受了一个和一个学习阶段长时间的停滞。“韦伯式的改革”发起必要的复兴欧洲batology。支柱:1)映射项目在更大的区域,2)评价类型的材料,3)参观位点classici, 4)评估的状态物种的分布地区。随后,它已成为widelyaccepted欧洲batology只有物种应该描述分布面积在50公里。虽然这种务实的物种概念有用的~一个席卷整个非洲大陆的概述荆棘,我们认为这是缺乏科学依据,因此应拒绝。治疗局部分布问题荆棘:1)主要混合动力车,2)本地分布式稳定apomicts, 3)种内物种的变化更大的分布范围,4)unstabilised成群ofhybridogenic生物型及其衍生物(主要在山地地区)。悬钩子属植物分类学,我们认为所有独立进化谱系描述为物种,包括单性生殖的血统与非常小的分布范围,从居住在山里的腺系列从低地。(由孤雌生殖不稳定),也没有生物型没有一个独立的和连贯的分布区域independendy进化血统,因此不应该被描述为物种。有限的描述新物种分布区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号