首页> 外文期刊>Annals of xcience and technology policy >4 Measuring Effectiveness of S&T Advice to Congress: Six Tests to Compare and Contrast Alternative Options
【24h】

4 Measuring Effectiveness of S&T Advice to Congress: Six Tests to Compare and Contrast Alternative Options

机译:4测量科技建议的有效性国会:六个测试来比较和对比选择选项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the last section revealed, Congress utilizes many sources of S&T advice that were originally designed and used primarily by the executive branch—the NRC is one example. However, congressional needs for S&T advice as historically provided by the options described above differ in significant ways from the needs of executive agencies. Congressional needs may vary significantly by subject area as well. For example, executive agency needs typically involve much more detailed analysis of specific dimensions of S&T research, commercialization, deployment, impact and other features while less so attempting to integrate across the "physical, biological, economic, social, and political effects of technology applications" (from OTA's charter).
机译:随着最后一节披露,国会利用许多科技建议最初的来源主要由执行设计和使用分支委员会就是一个例子。国会需要科技的建议历史描述提供的选项以上在重大方面的不同需求的执行机构。主题领域也有很大不同。例子,执行机构需要通常涉及更详细具体的分析科技研究的维度,商业化,部署,影响和其他特性而更少所以试图整合在“物理,生物、经济、社会和政治问题技术应用”(OTA的的影响宪章)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号