首页> 外文期刊>Annals of xcience and technology policy >6 Comparison with Other Analyses
【24h】

6 Comparison with Other Analyses

机译:6与其他分析比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An April 11, 2018 Senate hearing on the Cambridge Analytica scandall featuring Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed a shockingly weak understanding by Senators of the technology issues associated with the specific scandal or with the operation of now commonplace internet services like Facebook. This episode sparked resurgence interest in reinvesting in S&T capabilities in Congress so that it is better informed about the relevant issues. Following the hearing, many organizations explored the status of resources at Congress's disposal to analyze and inform legislation on issues with significant dimensions related to S&T. Among the many analyses appearing over the period 2018-2020 addressing the S&T policy support needs of Congress, prominent examples include those produced by: the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA, 2019), two studies completed at Harvard University (Graves and Schuman, 2020; Miesen et al., 2019), the American Political Science American Political Science Association (2019), and the Georgetown Law Center (Georgetown University School of Law, 2018), excerpts of which are recapped in the following.
机译:2018年4月11日,参议院听证会在剑桥分析scandall Facebook CEO马克扎克伯格透露了一个令人震惊的虚弱参议员理解的技术与特定的丑闻或相关的问题与现在普遍互联网的操作像Facebook的服务。复兴对科技进行再投资的兴趣国会的功能,这样就更好了了解相关的问题。听证会上,许多组织探索状态资源在国会的处理分析并告知立法问题意义重大维度与科技有关。分析2018 - 2020年期间出现解决的科技政策支持需求国会,突出的例子包括由:全国公共学院管理局(纳帕,2019),两项研究哈佛大学(坟墓和完成政治科学美国政治科学协会(2019),和乔治城大学法律中心(乔治敦大学法学院,2018年),摘录总结在下面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号