• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Review of Agricultural,Food and Environmental Studies >The impossible and necessary coexistenceof agricultural development models in the Pampas:the case of Santa Fe province (Argentina)
【24h】

The impossible and necessary coexistenceof agricultural development models in the Pampas:the case of Santa Fe province (Argentina)

机译：不可能和必要的coexistenceof农业发展模式的潘帕斯草原:圣达菲省(阿根廷)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article's objective is to highlight the different forms of agriculture present in the Argentinian Pampas, to analyse their logics, in particular in their relationships to the territory, and to discuss the relationships they have with each other.The theoretical framework adopted is that of "territorial pacts". This framework makes it possible to define for each form of agriculture through three dimensions of its local integration into the territory (territorial mediation) and through four dimensions of its integration into institutions (agricultural development model). This theoretical framework was taught and put into practice by a team of 7 or 8 researchers and teacher-researchers and 80 fifth-year students of agronomy within the framework ofa 1-week study trip repeated in three consecutive years in Santa Fe province. This is an interesting province for studying this subject because of the historical importance of family farming and the growth of large business farms. The method includes analyses of the agronomist's skills and reflections with students. Three agricultural development models could be distinguished and analysed: business farming, small-scale family farming and conventional farming. These models highlight the roles of technicians, cities, markets, symbolic issues and personal projects. In conclusion, it appears that relationships between these different models are more along the lines of a co-presence and not of a coexistence. The latter would require the construction of a local public space and a profound change in the models' current strategies. Nevertheless, a plural conception—and one that is open to dialogue—of the study programmes of the university faculties of agronomy could be a first step towards coexistence, since it appears that these faculties are at the centre of the tensions arising from co-presence.
机译：本文的目的是突出的不同形式的农业中阿根廷潘帕斯草原,分析他们的逻辑特别是他们的关系的领土,并讨论他们的关系有彼此。采用的是“领土协定”。框架可以定义为每一个通过三维形式的农业其本地集成到领土(领土中介),通过四个维度的融入机构(农业发展模式)。教理论框架和投入实践团队的研究人员和7点或8点teacher-researchers和80年第五年的学生农学1周的研究框架内次重复连续三年的圣诞老人菲省。因为历史研究这个主题家庭农业和经济增长的重要性大型企业农场。分析和农学家的技能反思与学生。可以和开发模型分析:商业农业、小规模的家庭农业和传统农业。突出技术人员的角色,城市,市场,象征性的问题和个人项目。总之,似乎关系这些不同模型之间沿行co-presence而共存。后者需要建设当地的公共空间和深刻的变化目前的策略模型。复数概念和开放对话的研究项目大学农艺系的可能是第一个一步共存,因为它似乎这些能力的紧张局势的中心因co-presence。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号