• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Engine + Powertrain Technology International >EDITOR'S NOTE
【24h】

EDITOR'S NOTE

机译：编者按

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Now more than ever, the powertrain industry is divided in its opinions. Despite so many manufacturers pledging their devotion to all-out electrification, I am certain that behind the scenes there are engineers shaking their heads, truly believing that there is another way out of the mess that the world has put itself in. I'm sure there will be plenty of you reading this thinking, 'Well, actually, it's always been like that.' And maybe you're right. But I do feel that the industry is more overt in its discussion now. During the turbocharging phase of the late 1980s and early 1990s, and the more recent downsizing trend that saw Ford and VW 1.0 engines come to the fore, it at least felt like there was some sort of consensus on the best technology to move us forward.
机译：现在比以往任何时候都更,动力系统行业分裂的意见。制造商承诺全力的奉献背后的电气化,我确信场景有工程师摇头,真正相信还有另一种方法世界已经把本身的混乱。你肯定会有大量的阅读思考,实际上,这一直是喜欢这一观念。现在这个行业更公开的讨论。在1980年代末的涡轮增压阶段1990年代初,最近的裁员趋势,福特和大众1.0引擎来前,至少感觉有一些的共识将最好的技术我们前进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号