• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Aerospace medicine and human performance. >Results of AMHP Journal Survey on Open Access
【24h】

Results of AMHP Journal Survey on Open Access

机译：AMHP期刊开放获取调查的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We were interested in learning about our authors' and reviewers' understanding and preferences concerning publishing in an Open Access (OA) journal. Many institutions are now requiring some kind of OA or depositing of work in a repository. Many journals are moving towards an author pay model and away from subscriptions. The Aerospace Medical Association's journal has successfully avoided page charges for nearly 90 years and is not ready to embrace OA as of yet. But we need to keep informed about trends in publishing and the needs of our authors. A Survey Monkey questionnaire was sent via a weblink to 476 current authors and reviewers of Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance listed in the Journal's Editorial Manager manuscript submission system. There were 26 questions, some with up to 15 subparts. We received 202 responses plus 8 emails giving opinions or reasons for not completing the survey. The response rate of 42% is notable considering the size and scope of the survey. The basic message was fairly simple, but the answers were quite complicated. The majority of respondents did not express a favorable view towards Open Access journals, but were sensitive to the needs of their employers/funders. Most are unwilling or unable to pay to publish. They appreciate a quality publication with robust peer review. The full survey and responses are available as supplemental data online (https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5032.2018). We are grateful to all who participated in the srfrvey as it shows above all how committed our authors and reviewers are to maintaining the quality of Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance.
机译：我们有兴趣学习作者的和评论者的理解和偏好关于发布在一个开放的访问(OA)日报》。OA或沉淀的工作在一个存储库中。许多刊物向作者支付模型和远离订阅。医学协会杂志的成功避免页面费用近90年还没有准备好接受OA。保持了解出版和趋势需要我们的作者。问卷调查是通过连接发送到476目前航空的代码开发者和评审者医学和人类中列出的性能杂志的编辑经理手稿提交系统。15部分。电子邮件不给意见或原因完成调查。是值得考虑的规模和范围调查。答案很复杂。的受访者不表达一个有利的观点对开放存取期刊,但敏感他们的雇主的需要/资助者。不愿或无力支付出版。高质量出版同行强劲升值审查。在线提供补充数据(https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5032.2018)。感谢所有参与srfrvey首先展示如何提交我们的作者和评论者维护的质量航空航天医学和人类的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号