...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers of Engineering Management >Tender evaluation through efficiency analysis for public construction contracts
【24h】

Tender evaluation through efficiency analysis for public construction contracts

机译:通过效率分析评标公共建筑合同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Given the European Public Procurement Directive 2014/24/EU, policymakers have ordered the inclusion of various criteria, such as the price, life-cycle costs, environmental, and social aspects, in the evaluation of tenders for public construction projects. Consequently, the relevance of non-monetary award criteria has gained significant value. However, the established evaluation formulas, which are used to obtain the best value for money procurement, have resulted in legal disputes. The existing evaluation formulas exhibit mathematical weaknesses, wherein scoring indices do not express economic efficiency adequately. Thus, a conflict is observed between the political requirement of non-monetary award criteria and their evaluation by contracting authorities. To overcome such dilemma, an extensive literature review is conducted. Specifically, this study explores the essential problems of existing evaluation formulas and develops a more reliable method. The technique from the field of efficiency analysis, i.e., Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), is adopted in this study. For contract awarding, the DEA is extended by introducing a decision theoretical framework. For public procurement, the proposed method combines two advantages. First, the proposed method ensures the derivation of a robust tender ranking given that with respect to clients' preferences, irrelevant and insufficiently tailored tenders do not influence the scoring. Second, the proposed method supports the intention of policy makers to promote public goals, such as sustainable aspects. By disclosing the strengths and weaknesses of bidders with respect to their competitors, all bidders can obtain a precise overview of their performance regarding the award criteria. In sum, the proposed method allows a targeted improvement of certain criteria values in future tenders and consequently leads to an enhancement of public goals.
机译:鉴于欧洲公共采购指令2014/24 /欧盟决策者下令包含不同的标准,如价格,生命周期成本、环境和社会在评价方面,对公开招标建设项目。非货币性奖励标准的相关性获得了重要的价值。建立了评价公式,使用获得钱采购的最佳值,导致了法律纠纷。评价公式展示数学弱点,其中得分指数不充分表达经济效率。是观察之间的政治冲突非货币性奖励标准和要求他们的评估由承包当局。克服这种困境,一个广泛的文献审查。探讨了现有的重要问题和发展一个更可靠的评价公式方法。效率分析,即数据包络采用分析(DEA),在这项研究中。发包,DEA延长引入决策理论框架。公共采购,该方法结合了两个优点。确保的推导一个健壮的温柔的排名鉴于对客户的偏好,无关紧要的和不够的招标不影响得分。方法支持决策者的意图促进公共目标,如可持续发展方面。投标人对其弱点竞争对手,所有投标人都可以获得一个精确的关于这个奖项的概述他们的表现标准。有针对性的改善一定标准的价值观在未来的招标,因此导致了增强公共目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号