...
首页> 外文期刊>Information Discovery and Delivery >Tracing the evolution of AI: conceptualization of artificial intelligence in mass media discourse
【24h】

Tracing the evolution of AI: conceptualization of artificial intelligence in mass media discourse

机译:跟踪人工智能的进化:概念化的人工智能在大众传媒话语

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - This study/paper aims to understand the public perceptions of AI through mass media discourse. In the past few years, significant progress has been made in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). The benefits of AI are obvious, but there is still huge uncertainty and controversy over the public perception of AI. How does the mass media conceptualize AI? Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, the authors analyze the evolution of AI covered by five major news media outlets in the past 30 years from 7 dimensions: scientific subject, keyword, country, institution, people, topic and opinion polarity. Findings - First of all, different subjects are competing for and dividing up the right to speak of AI, leading to the gradual fragmentation of the concept of AI. Second, reporting on AI often includes reference to commercial institutions and scientists, showing a successful integration of science and business. Moreover, the result of topic modeling shows that news media mainly defines AI from three perspectives: an imagination, a commercial product and a field of scientific research. Finally, negative reports have focused on various issues relating to AI ethics. Originality/value - The results can help bridge various conversations surrounding AI and promote richer discussions, increase the participation of scientists, businesses, governments and the public and provide more perspectives on the functions, prospects and pitfalls of AI.
机译:本研究目的——/论文旨在了解通过大众媒体公众的人工智能话语。进展领域的人工智能(人工智能)。明显,但仍存在巨大的不确定性艾城的公众争论。大众媒体概念化的人工智能吗?设计/方法/方法——本文分析人工智能的进化了五个主要新闻媒体在过去的30年7个维度:科学主题,关键字、国家、机构、人员、主题和看来极性。不同的学科竞争和分裂人工智能的发言权,导致的逐步分化,人工智能的概念。第二,报道AI通常包括参考商业机构和科学家,显示一个成功的集成科学业务。表明,新闻媒体主要定义AI三个视角:一个想象力,商业化产品和科学研究领域。最后,负面报道都集中在不同AI伦理相关的问题。结果可以帮助各种对话的桥梁周围的人工智能,促进丰富的讨论,增加科学家的参与,企业,政府和公众和提供更多的视角的功能,前景和AI的陷阱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号