...
首页> 外文期刊>Health education & behavior: the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education >Protective Factors and Biological Sex Differentiate Profiles of Teen Substance Users in Myanmar
【24h】

Protective Factors and Biological Sex Differentiate Profiles of Teen Substance Users in Myanmar

机译:保护性因素和生理性别区分用户概要文件的青少年物质缅甸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Reports on worldwide drug use include some information on risk factors, but virtually no information on protective factors, which are an important component of prevention programs. Aims. This study investigated protective factors and biological sex differences associated with patterns of substance use among adolescents in Myanmar, a country in Southeast Asia. Method. Myanmar high school students (N = 1,918; M-age = 15.35, SD = 1.07, range = 14-18; 56% female) completed a version of the Communities That Care survey validated for use in this population. Results. Latent class analysis revealed "Low Users" (38%), "Normative Users" (47%), and "Poly Drug Users" (15%) classes for males, and "Low Users" (80%), "Glue/Over-the-Counter Medication Users" (14%), and "High Users" (6%) classes for females. Univariate analyses indicated that belief in the moral order and positive family attachment differentiated profiles for both males and females; opportunities for prosocial family involvement, prosocial peer behavior, and opportunities to talk with teachers were additionally significant for males only. Logistic regression analysis comparing males in the "Low Users" and "Normative Users" classes indicated that opportunities for prosocial family involvement was protective after accounting for significant demographic and risk factors. In contrast, analyses comparing other classes of males or females found that once significant demographic and risk factors were controlled, protective factors did not discriminate classes. Conclusions. These data suggest that sex-specific prevention and intervention strategies may be more successful than universal approaches, and that attention to both risk and protective factors in prevention programming is warranted.
机译:背景。一些信息的风险因素,但实际上没有保护性因素的信息,预防项目的一个重要组成部分。目标和生物相关的性别差异青少年中物质使用的模式缅甸,一个在东南亚国家。缅甸高中生(N = 1918;15.35, SD = 1.07, = 14 - 18;完成了一个版本的社区护理调查验证在该人群使用。结果。用户”(38%)、“规范用户”(47%),和“聚男性吸毒者”(15%)类,和“低用户”(80%)、“胶/非处方药物用户”(14%)和“用户”(6%)类女性。相信道德秩序和积极的家庭附件有区别男性的概要文件和女性;参与,亲社会同行的行为,和机会和老师交谈另外重要的男性。回归分析比较“低的男性表示用户”和“规范用户”类亲社会的家庭的机会参与占后防护巨大的人口和危险因素。对比,分析比较其他类雄性或雌性发现一旦意义重大人口和危险因素控制,保护性因素没有歧视类。结论。预防和干预策略比通用方法,更成功同时关注风险和保护因素预防编程是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号