• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Collection and Curation >Lotka's law and author productivity pattern of research in law discipline
【24h】

Lotka's law and author productivity pattern of research in law discipline

机译：洛特卡定律和作者生产力的模式研究法律纪律

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose This study aims to analyze the productivity patterns of authors using law literature indexed in Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) from 2016 to 2020 based on Lotka's law. Lotka's law of scientific productivity provides a platform for studying the variation between the actual and expected authors' productivity patterns in a subject area over a specified period. Design/methodology/approach This study covers 3,334 open access journal articles in law subject. The law journals are subdivided into two basic divisions, namely, public law and private law. This paper focuses on the journal-wise distribution of publications, subject-wise distribution of publications, annual growth rate (AGR) as well as compound AGR and applicability of Lotka's law in both public and private law by applying the least square method followed by Pao and doing the K-S goodness-of-fit test. Student's t-test and chi-square test have been applied to verify the significant difference between the public law and the private law literature. Findings There is no significant difference between the public law and private law publications on their publications per issue. The chi-square test showed that there is no significant difference between the year-wise publications in public law and private law. The authorship productivity in public law differs from the distribution of Lotka's inverse square law, whereas it follows Lotka's law in the case of private law. Research limitations/implications This study is based on the articles published in open access English language journals which are indexed in the DOAJ. Originality/value This study will be useful to know the authorship productivity pattern of law literature for both public and private law individually.
机译：目的本研究旨在分析生产力的模式作者使用法律开放获取的文献索引目录期刊(开放存取)从2016年到2020年的基础上洛特卡定律。生产力为研究提供了一个平台实际和预期之间的差异作者的主题区域生产力模式在一个指定的时期。设计/方法/方法本研究涵盖了3334年法律开放获取期刊文章主题。基本的分歧,即公法和私人法律。分布的出版物,subject-wise分布的出版物,年增长率(AGR)以及复合AGR和适用性洛特卡定律的公法和私法应用最小二乘法Pao紧随其后拟合优度检验和做钴。t检验和卡方检验验证之间的显著差异公法和私法文学。结果没有显著差异在公法和私法出版物在其出版物/问题。卡方检验表明,没有year-wise之间的显著差异出版物在公法和私法。作者生产力在公共法律不同从分布的洛特卡平方反比法律,而此前洛特卡定律私法。本研究是基于文章发表在开放英语期刊的开放存取的索引。将有用的知道作者吗生产力模式的法律文献公共和私人法律单独。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Collection and Curation》 |2022年第2期|62-73|共12页
  • 作者

    Sahu Archana; Jena Puspanjali;

  • 作者单位

    Natl Law Univ Odisha, Dept Lib, Cuttack, India;

    Utkal Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Bhubaneswar, India;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类 G-052;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号