...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Global health promotion >Individual, social and national coping resources and their relationships with mental health and anxiety: A comparative study in Israel, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands during the Coronavirus pandemic
【24h】

Individual, social and national coping resources and their relationships with mental health and anxiety: A comparative study in Israel, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands during the Coronavirus pandemic

机译：个人、社会和国家应对资源及其与心理健康的关系焦虑:比较研究在以色列,意大利,西班牙和荷兰在冠状病毒流感大流行

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Employing the salutogenic model, we asked how individuals in different countries cope with the COVID-19 crisis and stay healthy. We were interested in exploring the individual (i.e. sense of coherence) as well as the social and national resources (i.e. social support, sense of national coherence, and trust in governmental institutions) that could explain levels of mental health and anxiety during the outbreak of the pandemic. Data collection was conducted via convenience sampling on online platforms, during the end of March and the beginning of April 2020. The data included four samples: 640 Israeli participants (319 males), 622 Dutch participants (177 males), 924 Italian participants (338 males) and 489 Spanish participants (117 males); age range of 18–88?years. The questionnaires included standard tools (MHC-SF, GAD-7, SOC, SONC). Several questions were adapted to the context of coronavirus and measured levels of exposure to COVID-19, trust in governmental institutions, and social support. The results significantly confirmed the suggested salutogenic model regarding the contribution to individual and national coping resources to anxiety levels and mental health. The patterns of the coping resources in explaining anxiety and mental health were similar in the four samples, and SOC was the main predictor these outcomes. Despite these similarities, a different pattern and also different magnitudes of the predictive value of the coping resources were found for the two different reactions: anxiety vs. mental health. While SOC and situational factors (like financial threat) were significant in explaining anxiety levels, the SOC and national resources were found as significant in explaining mental health levels. The findings support the salutogenic approach in studying reactions during pandemic time. They also shed some light on the difference between pathogenic and salutogenic measures in studying psychological reactions to stressful situations.
机译：采用健康本源模型,我们问到个人在不同国家应对COVID-19危机和保持健康。探索个人(即感兴趣。意义上的连贯性)以及社会国家资源(即社会支持的感觉国家凝聚力,对政府的信任机构)可以解释的心理水平健康的爆发期间和焦虑大流行。在网络平台上方便抽样,在3月底和4月初2020。数据包括四个样品:640以色列男性参与者(319),622年荷兰的参与者雄(177),924年意大利参与者(338男性)117年和489年西班牙参与者(男性);18 - 88范围?。标准工具(SONC MHC-SF GAD-7, SOC)。几个问题是适应的环境冠状病毒和测量的暴露水平COVID-19,对政府机构的信任社会支持。证实了提出健康本源模型关于对个人和做出的贡献国家应对资源和焦虑水平心理健康。资源在解释焦虑和心理健康在四个样品相似,SOC是吗主要预测这些结果。相似之处,也是一种不同的模式不同大小的预测价值两个应对资源被发现不同的反应:焦虑和心理健康。而SOC和情境因素(如金融威胁)是重要的在解释焦虑水平,SOC和国家资源被发现在解释心理健康的重要意义的水平。方法在研究大流行期间的反应时间。致病性和健康本源措施之间的关系研究心理反应压力的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号