...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >A call to arms
【24h】

A call to arms

机译：战斗的号令

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

On the 65th anniversary of the NHS, Farrell wittily exposes the pernicious new ideology of "private does it better" at the heart of the health service "reforms" and the inevitable deterioration in services forthose who cannot afford to pay upfront fortreatment.1 The Health and Social Care Act is ushering in a system that will cost more, be less efficient, and deliver less care. We are returningto a mixed health economy of the sort abandoned by common consent in 1948, putting the clock back in the name of "progress" such that (as John Lister has remarked) the coalition government can now claim credit for reinventing the flat tyre. The NHS was not perfect, but to destroy it by seeking to emulate the American model is unacceptable to all but the few who stand to make unhealthy profits.
机译：NHS的65周年,法雷尔俏皮地暴露了有害的新思想它是“私人更好”的核心卫生服务“改革”和不可避免的对于那些不能恶化服务支付前期fortreatment.1和社会保健法案引导系统将花费更多,是低效率的,并交付更少的关心。经济的抛弃了共同的同意1948年,把钟的名字“进步”(约翰·李斯特说)联合政府现在可以索赔信贷重塑爆了胎。不完美,但通过试图摧毁它效仿美国模式是不可接受的但少数人站不健康的利润。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号