...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Revalidation adds little to current appraisal processes
【24h】

Revalidation adds little to current appraisal processes

机译:重新生效几乎不增加当前的评估流程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On the usually sound principle that there is nothing in UK medicine that can't be made worse by the involvement of the General Medical Council, I have longtaken a beady eyed view of revalidation. Nobody can be against the general idea that doctors, like any professionals, should be kept up to the mark, but it has always been questionable whether revalidation will do much to achieve it. A serious risk is that revalidation will simply amount to a tsunami of paper in a system already creaking under the weight of bumph on governance, quality assurance, and performance indicators.
机译:通常的原则,有声音没有在英国医学不可能变得更糟通用医疗的参与委员会,我longtaken睁大眼睛盯着的重新生效。像任何专业人士,认为医生应该保持标志,但它一直可疑的重新生效是否会做得实现它。只会一个海啸的纸吗系统已经摇摇欲坠的重压下公文关于治理、质量保证和性能指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号