...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Tennis elbow myths
【24h】

Tennis elbow myths

机译：网球肘的神话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Orchard and Kountouris present a good summary of the evidence on so called tennis elbow, which is essentially that it's a painful self-limiting condition that gets better spontaneously and is not helped (at least on the basis of proper research) by medical intervention. Conventional treatments-and indeed some of the rapid responders to their article-vividly express the "need to do something" motive of doctors confronted with this condition. It's just a pity that Orchard and Kountouris compound the mystique around this condition by repeatedly referring to a tendon. There is no tendon at the site of the condition, as anyone who has explored the area will know. Rather, it is a musculoligamentous insertion. Hence there is no gliding problem and no tendinopathy as usually understood. Can we please put this myth to bed once and for all?
机译：果园和Kountouris呈现的一个很好的总结的所谓证据网球肘本质上这是一个痛苦的自我自然条件变得更好,没有帮助(至少在适当的基础研究)医疗干预。的确,以及一些快速急救员article-vividly表达“需要”动机的医生面对这种情况。果园和Kountouris化合物神秘感在这种情况下,反复提及肌腱。条件,探讨了该地区的人就会知道。插入。没有病变的一般理解。请把这个神话一劳永逸地上床睡觉吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号