...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Referral from primary to secondary care Older and more deprived patients remain at a disadvantage
【24h】

Referral from primary to secondary care Older and more deprived patients remain at a disadvantage

机译：从初级到中级保健年长和转诊更多的剥夺了病人仍处于劣势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Only a minority of people require hospital services, most people treat themselves or consult a generalist. General practitioners, who are usually the first point of contact for patients, must decide which patients to refer to secondary care. We do not know the extent to which people who are denied access to specialist services by the gatekeeper are disadvantaged. Some may be denied timely access to experts who are best placed to help. Alternatively, others may be harmed by unnecessary diagnostic tests and interventions. Therefore, the appropriate referral of cases to secondary care has economic, quality, and-sa'fety ramifications that resonate across the health sector and the globe. In light of this, the linked study by McBride and colleagues, presenting referral data for 130 000 British patients, is useful.
机译：只有少数人需要医院服务,大多数人对待自己或咨询一个多面手。通常病人的第一个接触点,必须决定哪些病人是指二次吗护理。拒绝进入专业服务的是谁门卫是弱势群体。否认及时获得专家是最好的放置来帮助。不必要的诊断测试和伤害干预措施。推荐的情况下,二级护理经济、质量,和sa 'fety后果,产生共鸣在卫生部门和各地。麦克布莱德的相关研究同事,介绍推荐数据为130 000英国病人,是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号