...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Discrepancies in autobiographical memories-implications for the assessment of asylum seekers: repeated interviews study
【24h】

Discrepancies in autobiographical memories-implications for the assessment of asylum seekers: repeated interviews study

机译：差异在自传memories-implications评估寻求庇护者:重复访谈研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective To investigate the consistency of autobiographical memory of people seeking asylum, in light of the assumption that discrepancies in asylum seekers' accounts of persecution mean that they are fabricating their stories. Design Repeated interviews. Setting England, 1999 and 2000. Participants Community sample of 27 Kosovan and 12 Bosnian refugees. Main outcome measures Discrepancies in repeated descriptions of one traumatic and one non-traumatic event, including specific details, rated as central or peripheral to the event. Self report measures of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Results Discrepancies between an individual's accounts were common. For participants with high levels of post-traumatic stress, the number of discrepancies increased with length of time between interviews. More discrepancies occurred in details peripheral to the account than in details that were central to the account. Conclusion The assumption that inconsistency of recall means that accounts have poor credibility is questionable. Discrepancies are likely to occur in repeated interviews. For refugees showing symptoms of high levels of post-traumatic stress, the length of the application process may also affect the number of discrepancies. Recall of details rated by the interviewee as peripheral to the account is more likely to be inconsistent than recall of details that are central to the account. Thus, such inconsistencies should not be relied on as indicating a lack of crediblity.
机译：目的探讨的一致性自传记忆的人寻求庇护,根据假设的差异寻求庇护者的迫害意味着账户他们编造的故事。多次面试。2000. 和12波斯尼亚难民。差异在重复的描述创伤性和非创伤性的事件,包括具体细节,被评为中央或外围的事件。创伤后压力心理障碍症和抑郁症。结果个体之间的差异账户是很常见的。创伤后应激水平的数量差异的时间长度增加而增大之间的采访。在细节比外围的帐户细节的中心账户。结论的假设不一致回忆意味着账户有可怜的可信度是有问题的。发生在重复面试。表现出高水平的创伤后的症状压力,申请程序的长度也会影响差异的数量。的细节被外围的应聘者账户更可能是不一致的比召回核心的细节帐户。依赖于作为缺乏crediblity指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号