...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain practice : >A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Brush Allodynia and Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing in the Detection of Allodynia Within Regions of Secondary Hyperalgesia in Humans
【24h】

A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Brush Allodynia and Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing in the Detection of Allodynia Within Regions of Secondary Hyperalgesia in Humans

机译:一个比较刷异常性疼痛的敏感性和Semmes-Weinstein单丝测试检测区域内的异常性疼痛二级痛觉过敏在人类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundTwo of the most common Quantitative Sensory Techniques (QST) employed to detect allodynia include mechanical brush allodynia and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. However, their relative sensitivity at detecting allodynia is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity of brush allodynia against Semmes-Weinstein monofilament technique for detecting allodynia within regions of secondary hyperalgesia in humans.
机译:BackgroundTwo最常见的定量感觉技术(QST)用来检测异常性疼痛包括机械电刷触诱发痛和Semmes-Weinstein单丝。相对灵敏度检测异常性疼痛知之甚少。比较刷异常性疼痛的敏感性针对Semmes-Weinstein单丝技术区域内检测异常性疼痛二级痛觉过敏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号