• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of behavioural science >TMI? Accompanying Details Impact Statements' Perceived Veracity
【24h】

TMI? Accompanying Details Impact Statements' Perceived Veracity

机译：TMI？随附的细节影响声明的感知真实性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Deception is a ubiquitous part of human interaction. However, discriminating between truthful and deceptive statements is an arduous task. Research has shown that truthful and deceptive accounts vary the type of content provided, suggesting that verbal cues are a diagnostic approach when discerning statement veracity. The present studies examine participants' expectations regarding what content is believed to be present in both truthful and deceptive statements. Specifically, we examined how different types of accompanying information impact statement believability. Participants read statements that varied in the content that was presented and indicated whether they believed the statement to be truthful or deceptive. Additionally, we manipulated consequence severity. Some participants were told that the statement provider had a high incentive to lie while others were told that there was a low incentive. Across both experiments, we observed that certain types of additional information decreased statement believability. Specifically, statements that included a personal qualification or an excuse were more likely to be perceived as being deceptive than statements that did not contain additional details or contained details specific to the task. This finding was true regardless of consequence severity. These findings suggest that not all accompanying details increase credibility and are discussed through the lens of Gricean maxims as well as other theories of deception detection. Public Significance Statement Research has shown that people perform poorly when distinguishing truthful from deceptive statements. The present studies explore how additional accompanying information may make a statement appear more or less believable. The results from these studies found that statements that included details about the speakers' personal character or an excuse were more likely to be judged as deceptive compared to statements that had minimal information or details specific to the task. Information about the situational factors did not seem to impact these judgments.
机译：欺骗是一种普遍存在的人类的一部分交互。真实的和欺骗性的语句是一个艰巨的的任务。欺骗性的账户不同内容的类型提供,这表明语言线索诊断方法的声明的真实性。参与者的预期有关的内容被认为是目前的真实和吗欺骗性的语句。不同类型的相关信息吗影响陈述可信度。声明的内容不同并表示他们是否相信声明是真实的或欺骗性。此外,我们操纵的结果严重性。声明提供者有高的动机所在而另一些则被告知有一个低激励。某些类型的附加信息陈述可信度下降。报表,包括个人的资格或者更有可能被认为是借口比语句不被欺骗包含更多的细节或包含的细节特定的任务。不管后果严重性。研究结果表明,并非所有的陪同提高信誉和细节进行了讨论通过镜头Gricean格言一样其他理论欺骗检测。研究表明,意义的语句人们表现不佳有区别的真实的欺骗性声明。研究探讨额外的陪同信息可能出现或多或发表声明不太可信。发现报表,包括细节演讲者的个人性格或借口更有可能被评价为假吗而最小的语句信息或特定于任务的细节。情境因素的信息没有似乎这些判断的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号