• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility >Technology ethics assessment: Politicising the ‘Socratic approach’
【24h】

Technology ethics assessment: Politicising the ‘Socratic approach’

机译：技术伦理评估：将“苏格拉底方法”政治化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract That technologies may raise ethical issues is now widely recognised. The ‘responsible innovation’ literature – as well as, to a lesser extent, the applied ethics and bioethics literature – has responded to the need for ethical reflection on technologies by developing a number of tools and approaches to facilitate such reflection. Some of these instruments consist of lists of questions that people are encouraged to ask about technologies – a methodology known as the ‘Socratic approach’. However, to date, these instruments have often not adequately acknowledged various political impacts of technologies, which are, I suggest, essential to a proper account of the ethical issues they raise. New technologies can make some people richer and some people poorer, empower some and disempower others, have dramatic implications for relationships between different social groups and impact on social understandings and experiences that are central to the lives, and narratives, of denizens of technological societies. The distinctive contribution of this paper, then, is to offer a revised and updated version of the Socratic approach that highlights the political, as well as the more traditionally ethical, issues raised by the development of new technologies.
机译：文摘技术可以提高道德问题是现在被广泛认可。创新”文学,以及,在较小程度上,应用伦理学和生命伦理文学——回应的必要性通过发展伦理反思技术一些工具和方法来促进这样的反思。由人的列表的问题——鼓励询问技术方法称为“苏格拉底方法”。然而,迄今为止,这些仪器经常没有充分承认各种政治我认为,技术的影响,必要的适当的伦理他们提出的问题。使人富有,有的人贫穷一些力量剥夺他人,引人注目对不同的之间的关系社会团体和对社会认知的影响生活的中心和经验,和叙述,居民的技术社会。纸,然后,是提供一个修订和更新版本的苏格拉底的方法,突出了政治、以及更多的传统开发新提出的伦理问题技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号