首页> 外文期刊>The New Republic >I Argued Roe v. Wade. It Would Be a Tragedy to Disarm It
【24h】

I Argued Roe v. Wade. It Would Be a Tragedy to Disarm It

机译:我争论了罗伊诉韦德案。解除它的武装将是一场悲剧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IN JANUARY, Roe v. Wade will celebrate its fiftieth anniversary. In the meantime, as the United States Supreme Court deliberates over whether to support or disarm the 1973 ruling, the nation watches and waits. I am the former attorney for Norma McCorvey, the plaintiff in the case, better known as Jane Roe, and I have profound concerns-not for history, for the future. My co-counsel Sarah Weddington and I forged for American women the right to privacy, not just in abortion law, but in all parts of one's personal life. A better sense of what is at stake today can perhaps be gleaned from the legal journey we took to establish that right.
机译:今年1月,罗伊诉韦德案将庆祝它五十周年纪念日。美国最高法院在商议是否支持或解除1973年执政国家手表和等待。诺玛·麦考维律师原告的情况下,更好地称为简·罗伊,和我对历史的深刻的问题不,的未来。伪造的美国妇女隐私权,不仅在堕胎法律,但在所有的部分一个人的私人生活。股份今天也许可以从法律我们建立正确的旅程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The New Republic》 |2022年第6期|28-29|共2页
  • 作者

    Linda Coffee;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号