...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >The reliability of end of day and ecological momentary assessments of pain and pain interference in individuals with spinal cord injury
【24h】

The reliability of end of day and ecological momentary assessments of pain and pain interference in individuals with spinal cord injury

机译：The reliability of end of day and ecological momentary assessments of pain and pain interference in individuals with spinal cord injury

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

PurposeThis study investigated the most efficient means of measuring pain intensity and pain interference comparing ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to end of day (EOD) data, with the highest level of measurement reliability as examined in individuals with spinal cord injury.MethodsEMA (five times throughout the day) and EOD ratings of pain and pain interference were collected over a 7-day period. Multilevel models were used to examine the reliability for both EOD and EMA assessments in order to determine the amount of variability in these assessments over the course of a week or the day, and a multilevel version of the Spearman-Brown Prophecy formula was used to estimate values for reliability.ResultsFindings indicate the minimum of number of EOD and EMA assessments needed to achieve different levels of reliability (adequate 0.70, good0.80 and excellent0.90). In addition, the time of day (either morning, midday or evening) did not impact the estimated reliability for the EMA assessments.ConclusionsThese findings can help researchers and clinician balance the cost/benefit tradeoffs of these different types of assessments by providing specific cutoffs for the numbers of each type of assessment that are needed to achieve excellent reliability.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号