...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >Comparison of the use of AnaConDa (R) versus AnaConDa-S (R) during the post-operative period of cardiac surgery under standard conditions of practice
【24h】

Comparison of the use of AnaConDa (R) versus AnaConDa-S (R) during the post-operative period of cardiac surgery under standard conditions of practice

机译：Comparison of the use of AnaConDa (R) versus AnaConDa-S (R) during the post-operative period of cardiac surgery under standard conditions of practice

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Changes have been made to the AnaConDa device (Sedana Medical, Stockholm, Sweden), decreasing its size to reduce dead space and carbon dioxide (CO2) retention. However, this also involves a decrease in the surface area of the activated carbon filter. The CO2 elimination and sevoflurane (SEV) reflection of the old device (ACD-100) were thus compared with the new version (ACD-50) in patients sedated after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After ERC approval and written informed consent, 23 patients were sedated with SEV, using first the ACD-100 and then the ACD-50 for 60 min each. With each device, patients were ventilated with tidal volumes (TV) of 5 ml/kg of ideal body weight for the first 30 min, and with 7 ml/kg for the next 30 min. Ventilation parameters, arterial blood gases, Bispectral-Index (TM) (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems Inc., Newton, MA, USA), SEV concentrations exhaled by the patient (SEV-exhaled) and from the expiratory hose (SEV-lost) were recorded every 30 min. A SEV reflection index was calculated: SRI [%] = 100 x (1 - (SEV-lost/SEV-exhaled)). Data were compared using ANOVA with repeated measurements and Student's T-tests for pairs. Respiratory rates, tidal and minute volumes were not significantly different between the two devices. End tidal and arterial CO2 partial pressures were significantly higher with the ACD-100 as compared with the ACD-50. SEV infusion rate remained constant. SEV reflection was higher (SRI: ACD-100 vs. ACD-50, TV 5 ml/kg: 95.29 +/- 6.45 vs. 85.54 +/- 11.15, p = 0.001; 7 ml/kg: 93.42 +/- 6.55 vs. 88.77 +/- 12.26, p = 0.003). BIS was significantly lower when using the higher TV (60.91 +/- 9.99 vs. 66.57 +/- 8.22, p = 0.012), although this difference was not clinically relevant. During postoperative sedation, the use of ACD-50 significantly reduced CO2 retention. SEV reflection was slightly reduced. However, patients remained sufficiently sedated without increasing SEV infusion.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号