• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Grafting Area Reduction in Peyronie's Disease Surgery: Comparative Assessment Between Double Y Vs iGrafter APP Using 3D-Printed Penile Models
【24h】

Grafting Area Reduction in Peyronie's Disease Surgery: Comparative Assessment Between Double Y Vs iGrafter APP Using 3D-Printed Penile Models

机译：Grafting Area Reduction in Peyronie's Disease Surgery: Comparative Assessment Between Double Y Vs iGrafter APP Using 3D-Printed Penile Models

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: The use of plaque incision and graft techniques (PIG) for the treatment of severe Peyronie's disease (PD), may lead to erectile dysfunction (ED); graft size is 1 of the contributing factors for post-PIG ED. Recently the iGrafter software APP was introduced using a mathematical algorithm to distribute the incisions along the penile length resulting in a smaller grafting area. Aim: Compare 2 PIG techniques, the Double-Y(DY) and iGrafter, in 3 main aspects: (i) Total grafting area; (ii) The variation in calculating the grafting to be used; (iii) time to perform the PIG. Methods: Six urologists with expertise in sexual medicine performed both techniques twice using four 3-D validated training models for PD with a standard 60 degrees uniplanar dorsal curvature. Outcomes: The graft areas and operative partial and total time for each step of the operation were recorded for each procedure. Unpaired t-test and the coefficient of variation for graft area across surgeons was calculated comparing both techniques. Results: For all surgeons, the use of iGrafter resulted in 2 grafts, for the DY technique in 1 graft. Overall, TT for the iGrafter was significantly longer than for DY technique (49.4 +/- 11 vs 40.7 +/- 5.7 minute; P = .02), The iGrafter grafting area was significantly smaller (11.6 +/- 1.2 vs 23.3 +/- 5.4 cm(2); P: .01), representing a 50.2% area reduction when compared to the DY. The variation of graft area, using the iGrafter also yielded a more consistent graft across all surgeons (CV = 10.56% vs 23.28%). Clinical Significance: The iGrafter, when compared to DY technique, reduced the graft area by 50%, which potentially means less erectile dysfunction. Strengths and Limitations: Our study eliminates anatomical variations found in a real clinical case making it possible to compare surgical techniques with the same penile anatomy. However, the 3D-printed model cannot replicate the living human tissue property preventing a simulation close to actual surgery. Conclusion: The use of the iGrafter software for PIG surgery has shown to be a promising technique for severe PD management resulting in smaller graft size (about 50% smaller when compared to the DY), although it might be more time-consuming. Copyright (C) 2022, International Society of Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号