COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

L. B. Mokkink; H. C. W. de Vet; C. A. C. PrinsenD. L. PatrickJ. AlonsoL. M. BouterC. B. Terwee

首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

【24h】

COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

机译：COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相关主题

摘要

Purpose The original COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was developed to assess the methodological quality of single studies on measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Now it is our aim to adapt the COSMIN checklist and its four-point rating system into a version exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs, aiming to assess risk of bias of studies on measurement properties. Methods For each standard (i.e., a design requirement or preferred statistical method), it was discussed within the COSMIN steering committee if and how it should be adapted. The adapted checklist was pilot-tested to strengthen content validity in a systematic review on the quality of PROMs for patients with hand osteoarthritis. Results Most important changes were the reordering of the measurement properties to be assessed in a systematic review of PROMs; the deletion of standards that concerned reporting issues and standards that not necessarily lead to biased results; the integration of standards on general requirements for studies on item response theory with standards for specific measurement properties; the recommendation to the review team to specify hypotheses for construct validity and responsiveness in advance, and subsequently the removal of the standards about formulating hypotheses; and the change in the labels of the four-point rating system. Conclusions The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was developed exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs to distinguish this application from other purposes of assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties, such as guidance for designing or reporting a study on the measurement properties.

著录项

来源
《Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation》 |2018年第5期|1171-1179|共9页
作者
L. B. Mokkink; H. C. W. de Vet; C. A. C. PrinsenD. L. PatrickJ. AlonsoL. M. BouterC. B. Terwee;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU;

Department of Health Services, University of Washington;

Health Services Research Unit, Institut Municipal d’Investigacio Medica (IMIM-Hospital del Mar);

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种英语
中图分类医药、卫生;
关键词
Quality assessment; Systematic review; Risk of bias; Measurement properties; Outcome measurement instruments;

COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

摘要

著录项

相关主题

期刊订阅