Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders

Hays Ron D.; Peipert John Devin

首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders

【24h】

Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders

机译：Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相关主题

摘要

Purpose Estimates of the minimally important change (MIC) can be used to evaluate whether group-level differences are large enough to be important. But responders to treatment have been based upon group-level MIC thresholds, resulting in inaccurate classification of change over time. This article reviews options and provides suggestions about individual-level statistics to assess whether individuals have improved, stayed the same, or declined.

著录项

来源
《Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation》 |2021年第10期|2765-2772|共8页
作者
Hays Ron D.; Peipert John Devin;
展开▼
作者单位

UCLA, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Hlth Serv Res, 1100 Glendon Ave,Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA;

Northwestern Univ, Dept Med Social Sci, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种英语
中图分类医药、卫生;
关键词
Meaningful change; Minimally important difference; Responder; Reliable change index;

Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders

摘要

著录项

相关主题

期刊订阅