...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Neural computing & applications >A comparative study of pre-screening strategies within a surrogate-assisted multi-objective algorithm framework for computationally expensive problems
【24h】

A comparative study of pre-screening strategies within a surrogate-assisted multi-objective algorithm framework for computationally expensive problems

机译：A comparative study of pre-screening strategies within a surrogate-assisted multi-objective algorithm framework for computationally expensive problems

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

The multi-offspring method has been recognized as an efficient approach to enhance the performance of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. However, some pre-screening strategies should be used when a multi-offspring-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is used to solve computationally expensive problems. So far, there is no any reported comprehensive study that compares the effects of different pre-screening strategies on the performance of the multi-offspring-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In this paper, four pre-screening strategies (convergence-based, maximin distance-based expected improvement matrix (EIM-based), diversity-based and random-based strategies) for the multi-offspring-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm are compared. The convergence-based strategy gives more priority to non-dominated solutions, and it is vital for exploiting the current promising areas. The diversity-based strategy gives more priority to solutions with greater uncertainties, and it is important for exploring the sparse areas. The EIM-based strategy considers the exploration and exploitation simultaneously, and the random-based strategy gives no priority to any solution. A series of benchmark problems whose dimensions vary from 8 to 30 and a reactive power optimization problem are used to test the multi-offspring-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm under the four pre-screening strategies. The experimental results show that the convergence-based strategy performs best on most of the simple problems, while the EIM-based strategy performs best on most of the complex problems. The diversity-based strategy can produce positive effects on some problems, while the random-based strategy cannot improve the performance of its basic algorithm.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号