On digital theorizing, clickbait research, and the cumulative tradition

Abayomi Baiyere; Nicholas Berente; Michel Avital

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of information technology >On digital theorizing, clickbait research, and the cumulative tradition

【24h】

On digital theorizing, clickbait research, and the cumulative tradition

机译：On digital theorizing, clickbait research, and the cumulative tradition

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相关主题

摘要

The pursuit of novel and indigenous digital theories is a thought-provoking call by Grover and Lyytinen. Such a piece is direly needed, and we hope it will spark a reinvigoration of the field. However, despite its many merits and our alignment with its message, we have two comments or caveats for readers of their piece. These are—a) a need to re-emphasize the value of attending to the cumulative tradition in our pursuit of digital theorizing, and relatedly b) an unreflective reading of the paper may risk mobilizing IS scholarship towards clickbait research. We further highlight three anchors that future scholarship can consider in attending to these issues a) problematization anchor, b) implications anchor, and c) boundary-spanning anchor. With these points, we add more volume to amplify the message of G&L and offer suggestions for pursuing innovative digital theories that go beyond ephemeral theorizing.

著录项

来源
《Journal of information technology》 |2023年第1期|67-73|共7页
作者
Abayomi Baiyere; Nicholas Berente; Michel Avital;
展开▼
作者单位

Smith Business School, Queen's University||Digitalization Department;

Mendoza College of Business;

Digitalization Department;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种英语
中图分类
关键词
Digital theorizing; theory building; cumulative tradition; clickbait research; problematization; debate;

On digital theorizing, clickbait research, and the cumulative tradition

摘要

著录项

相关主题

期刊订阅