Can the use of deception be justified in medical education research? A point/counterpoint and case study

Maxfield Charles M.; Thorpe Matthew P.; Desser Terry S.Heitkamp DarelHull Nathan C.Koontz Nicholas A.Welch Timothy J.Grimm Lars J.

首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Can the use of deception be justified in medical education research? A point/counterpoint and case study

【24h】

Can the use of deception be justified in medical education research? A point/counterpoint and case study

机译：Can the use of deception be justified in medical education research? A point/counterpoint and case study

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相关主题

摘要

Deception is a common feature of behavioral research design, although not commonly employed in the medical literature. It can promote scientific validity but is ethically controversial because it compromises subject autonomy and incurs additional costs. In this Point/Counterpoint monograph, we review the nature of deception in research and present arguments for and against its ethical use as a research methodology in behavioral studies. We describe the necessary guidelines, safeguards, and oversight, when deceptive methodology is considered, and report our experiences and lessons learned from conducting a multi-institutional audit study that relied upon deception (C) 2021 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

著录项

来源
《Academic radiology》 |2022年第7期|1091-1094|共4页
作者
Maxfield Charles M.; Thorpe Matthew P.; Desser Terry S.Heitkamp DarelHull Nathan C.Koontz Nicholas A.Welch Timothy J.Grimm Lars J.;
展开▼
作者单位

Dept Radiol,Duke Univ;

Dept Radiol,Mayo Clin Rochester;

Dept Radiol,Stanford UnivAdventHlth Med GrpDept Radiol & Imaging Sci,Indiana Univ Sch Med;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种英语
中图分类放射医学;
关键词
DISCRIMINATION; RECRUITMENT; ETHICS; ISSUES; IMPACT;

Can the use of deception be justified in medical education research? A point/counterpoint and case study

摘要

著录项

相关主题

期刊订阅