...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of manufacturing processes >A comparative assessment of energy demand and life cycle costs for additive- and subtractive-based manufacturing approaches
【24h】

A comparative assessment of energy demand and life cycle costs for additive- and subtractive-based manufacturing approaches

机译:A comparative assessment of energy demand and life cycle costs for additive- and subtractive-based manufacturing approaches

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The applicability domain of Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes, apart from technological and quality results, relies on environmental and cost performance. These aspects still need to be better understood. To this aim, comparative analyses with conventional manufacturing routes are needed. In this paper, empirical cost and energy requirement models are suggested to assess subtractive- (machining) and additive- (Electron Beam Melting) based manufacturing approaches for the production of Ti-6Al-4V components. A life-cycle perspective adopted, and all the steps from the input material production to the post-AM processing operations and the use phase are included. The analyses have been carried out considering the shape of the component, the lightweighting capabilities and the utilization time as the main factors of influence. The proposed modelling effort has allowed different decision-support charts, which are suitable for identifying the most energy-efficient or economically-advantageous manufacturing approach, to be obtained. The results have revealed that, for the considered case study, EBM could be a more energy-efficient approach than conventional machining, even without re-designing the component, due to the higher efficiency in raw material usage. As far as cost is concerned, the additive-based approach only becomes the preferable solution when the cost savings during the use phase are accounted for.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号