...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Quantification Method and Training Load Changes in High School Cross-Country Runners Across a Competitive Season
【24h】

Quantification Method and Training Load Changes in High School Cross-Country Runners Across a Competitive Season

机译:Quantification Method and Training Load Changes in High School Cross-Country Runners Across a Competitive Season

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Running programs traditionally monitor external loads (eg, time and distance). Recent efforts have encouraged a more comprehensive approach to also account for internal loads (eg, intensity, measured as the session rating of perceived exertion [sRPE]). The combination of external and internal loads accounts for the possible interaction between these loads. Although weekly changes in training loads have been reported between external loads and the combination of external and internal loads during 2- and 4-week training cycles, no authors have indicated whether these differences occur during an entire cross-country season in high school runners. Objective: To compare changes in training loads, as measured by (1) external loads and (2) combined external and internal loads in high school runners during an interscholastic cross-country season. Design: Case series. Setting: Community-based setting with daily online surveys. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-four high school cross-country runners (females = 14, males = 10, age = 15.9 6 1.1 years, running experience = 9.9 ± 3.2 years). Main Outcome Measure(s): Week-to-week percentage changes in training load were measured by external loads (time, distance) and combined external and internal loads (time × sRPE [timeRPE] and distance 3 sRPE [distanceRPE]). Results: Overall, the average weekly change was 7.1% greater for distanceRPE than for distance (P = .04, d = 0.18). When the weekly running duration decreased, we found the average weekly change was 5.2% greater for distanceRPE than for timeRPE (P = .03, d = 0.24). When the weekly running duration was maintained or increased, the average weekly change was 10% to 15% greater when external and internal loads were combined versus external loads alone, but these differences were nonsignificant (P = .11-.22, d = 0.19- 0.34). Conclusions: Progression in the training load may be underestimated when relying solely on external loads. The interaction between internal loads (sRPE) and external loads (distance or time) appears to provide a different measure of the training stresses experienced by runners than external loads alone. ? 2022 National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc.. All rights reserved.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号