Factors associated with long-term use of restrictive interventions

Richardson Ben; Webber Lynne S.; Lambrick Frank

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intellectual & developmental disability >Factors associated with long-term use of restrictive interventions

【24h】

Factors associated with long-term use of restrictive interventions

机译：Factors associated with long-term use of restrictive interventions

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相关主题

摘要

Background: Despite agreement that restrictive intervention (RI) should only be used as a last resort and for as long as required, little is known about long-term RI among individuals with a disability. This study examines long-term RI use. Method: From the Restrictive Intervention Data System dataset from Victoria, Australia, a cohort of 1,414 people reported to be restrained or secluded between July 2008 and June 2010 were identified. The primary outcome was restraint during the follow-up period (July 2013-June 2015). Measures of the secondary outcome, reasons for restraint cessation, were assessed via a self-report survey completed by 54 service providers. Results: At follow up, 74% of the cohort was still subject to RI. Antipsychotic medication use, a diagnosis of autism, and communication difficulties were associated with the use of restrictive interventions at follow up. Conclusions: Long-term RI is prevalent, but can be minimised by positive behaviour support.

著录项

来源
《Journal of intellectual & developmental disability》 |2020年第2期|159-166|共8页
作者
Richardson Ben; Webber Lynne S.; Lambrick Frank;
展开▼
作者单位

Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Burwood, Australia;

Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Off Profess Practice, Melbourne, Vic, Australia;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种英语
中图分类神经病学与精神病学;
关键词
Intellectual disability; restraint; seclusion; challenging behaviour; autism; antipsychotic medications;

Factors associated with long-term use of restrictive interventions

摘要

著录项

相关主题

期刊订阅