• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Agrica >Assessing Concordance Between Two Methods for Sugarcane Brown Rust Evaluation
【24h】

Assessing Concordance Between Two Methods for Sugarcane Brown Rust Evaluation

机译：Assessing Concordance Between Two Methods for Sugarcane Brown Rust Evaluation

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Concordance evaluations between evaluation methods or evaluators are common in medical disciplines, but not in agricultural sciences, 'The objective of this study was to detect the concordance between two methods used to determine the percentage of leaf area affected by brown rust in sugarcane: visual estimation and image analysis using ImageJ~R 1.43u software. For this, the percentage ‘of area affected by pustules was determined according to each procedure during two trials. Correlation analysis,concordance correlation coefficient calculation and concordance test were performed. Pearson's correlation was not constant within the range of data evaluated, which represents a difficulty in detecting systematic differences. The concordance correlationcoefficient was classified as poor, while the Bland-Altman concordance analysis allowed detecting a bias of -1,48% and -0:57% between the methods in both trials, which is considered acceptable. The study showed that both procedures agree, but the valuesmeasured visually tend to be higher than those obtained with the ImageJ~R 1.43u software, mainly in cultivars with a larger leaf area affected by the disease. The procedure described in this work facilitates decision-making on the opportunity to substitute or use diff erent methods for the evaluation of brown rust in sugarcane, which can also be applied to other pathosyslems or disciplines.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号