• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian infection control: official journal of the Australian Infection Control Association Inc >Journal Watch
【24h】

Journal Watch

机译：日志观察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this study, the authors wanted to identify the proportion of hospital patients that were found to be colonised with MRSA by clinical microbiological cultures alone. In the United States, many hospitals do not perform active surveillance cultures, nor do they have screening guidelines, continuing to rely only on clinical specimen cultures to identify MRSA colonised patients.Patients were swabbed on admission to the hospital; the number of clinical specimens that were positive for MRSA was compared with the number of positive screening results. Patients found to be colonised were placed under contact precautions. Results showed 437 patients were colonised with MRSA. The number of clinical specimen cultures positive for MRSA was 98 from 66 patients. The clinical specimen cultures identified only 15% of MRSA-colonised patients, therefore failing to find 85%.
机译：在这项研究中，作者希望确定仅通过临床微生物培养就被MRSA定殖的住院患者比例。在美国，许多医院没有进行主动监测培养，也没有筛查指南，仅依靠临床标本培养来鉴定MRSA定植的患者。将MRSA阳性的临床标本数量与阳性筛选结果的数量进行比较。发现被定植的患者处于接触预防措施下。结果显示有437名患者被MRSA定植。 66名患者中MRSA阳性的临床标本培养数量为98。临床标本培养仅鉴定出15％的MRSA克隆患者，因此未找到85％。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号