• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles >Design and Control Co-optimization of a Mixed Hybrid Electric Powertrain Architecture
【24h】

Design and Control Co-optimization of a Mixed Hybrid Electric Powertrain Architecture

机译：Design and Control Co-optimization of a Mixed Hybrid Electric Powertrain Architecture

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Electrification of vehicles can improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions in vehicle operations. Studies have focused on designing powertrains of several topologies, including serial, parallel, and power-split hybrid powertrains. In this study, a design and control co-optimization is demonstrated for a novel mixed-powertrain architecture. The component sizes of the mixed powertrain are optimized to minimize the fuel and component costs. Nested optimization is applied with a surrogate integrated operation and control model that evaluates powertrain performance in the inner loop. The surrogate model is trained to capture the powertrain performance under a near-optimal power management approach, namely, the equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS). Using sequential quadratic programming, optimal results are obtained and verified using a high-fidelity powertrain model which is equipped with ECMS control. Multiple optimal designs can be selected for this multi-objective optimization problem. All designs can either improve the fuel economy or reduce the component sizes, or both, depending on the weighing of fuel economy and component cost. Compared to the original design, one of the optimal solutions can improve the fuel economy by 24.5% while keeping component sizes similar. Another optimal design can achieve similar fuel economy while reducing the rated power of the electric machines by 49.2% and 30.1%, the battery voltage by 51.3%, and battery capacity by 72.9%. Four selected commercially available powertrain architectures are investigated to benchmark the mixed powertrain. The fuel economies of the benchmark architectures are up to 15% different compared to the fuel economy of the mixed powertrain. The range in both component and fuel cost of the Pareto front of the mixed powertrain is widest among the powertrains in this study.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号