...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surgical education >Learning to SuRRF: Sustained Engagement and Increased Academic Productivity Over Two Years of a Resident-Led Virtual Laboratory
【24h】

Learning to SuRRF: Sustained Engagement and Increased Academic Productivity Over Two Years of a Resident-Led Virtual Laboratory

机译：Learning to SuRRF: Sustained Engagement and Increased Academic Productivity Over Two Years of a Resident-Led Virtual Laboratory

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine if implementation of a resident-led virtual laboratory can sustain increased engagement and academic productivity in residents and faculty. DESIGN: We developed and introduced a multimodal virtual Surgery Resident Research Forum (SuRRF) in July 2019. SuRRF utilizes monthly virtual lab meetings, weekly newsletters, a centralized database of projects, project tracking tools, and a shared calendar of deadlines to facilitate research among surgical residents. Data on number of participating residents, faculty, and projects across SuRRF meetings at 1-year (7/2020) and 2-years post-implementation (9/2021) were collected to evaluate engagement. Institutional ACGME Resident Scholarly Activity and Faculty Scholarly Activity reports were evaluated for the pre-SuRRF implementation (2018-2019) and post-implementation (2020-2021) academic years to assess productivity pre- and post-implementation. SETTING: Three tertiary academic hospitals of a single health system in New York. PARTICIPANTS: All residents in our general surgery program during the study period, including research residents, were eligible to participate in our study. RESULTS: At 1-year, there were 2 attendings, 13 residents, and 23 projects, compared to 12 attendings, 25 residents, and 42 projects at 2-years post-implementation. Post-SuRRF implementation, residents had significantly more publications (0.56 +/- 0.15 vs. 1.10 +/- 0.15, p = 0.005), textbook chapters (0.00 vs. 0.010 +/- 0.044, p = 0.014), research participation (p < 0.01), and scholarly activity (p = 0.02). Post-SuRRF, faculty had significantly more publications (0.74 +/- 0.15 vs. 2.20 +/- 0.33, p < 0.001) and scholarly activity (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: SuRRF promotes exposure to projects and resources and increases collaboration and peer-to-peer mentorship. Our experience with SuRRF suggests that resident-led virtual laboratories may increase peer-reviewed publications and improve resident and faculty engagement in scholarly activity, thus supporting academic growth. (C) 2022 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号