• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of public health >Does public report card matter? A 10-year interrupted time series analysis on total knee replacement
【24h】

Does public report card matter? A 10-year interrupted time series analysis on total knee replacement

机译：Does public report card matter? A 10-year interrupted time series analysis on total knee replacement

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: There is a lack of evidence that shows whether a report card can improve health outcomes in terms of infection rates or unscheduled readmission by using rigorous methods to evaluate its impact. Methods: We used the National Health Insurance Administration's claims database from 1 January 2004 to 30 December 2013 and a time series analysis to evaluate the impact of the quality report card initiative on three negative outcomes of total knee replacement for each quarter of the year, including the rates of superficial infection of a knee replacement, deep infection of knee arthroplasty and unplanned readmissions for surgical site infection. Results: These negative outcomes (original scale) do not show significant decreases in terms of superficial infection (-0.05 parts per thousand, -0.63 to 0.53 parts per thousand, P = 0.87), deep infection (-0.003 parts per thousand, -0.19 to 0.18 parts per thousand, P = 0.97) and unscheduled readmission (0.02 parts per thousand, -0.21 to 0.25 parts per thousand, P = 0.88). Conclusion: The total knee replacement public report card initiative did not improve the rate of infection and unscheduled readmission for surgical site infection. This report card in Taiwan should involve physicians' participation in the design and be tailored to be suitable for reading by patients in order to further enhance the chance of improvement in these negative outcomes.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号