...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Optical Engineering >Cylindrical surface shape measurement method and measurement comparison
【24h】

Cylindrical surface shape measurement method and measurement comparison

机译：Cylindrical surface shape measurement method and measurement comparison

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Optical elements are used in various fields, in which it is required to measure spherical, aspherical, and free-form surface shapes. We use a nanoprofiler previously developed by our research group to measure a cylindrical surface shape. Unlike spherical or aspherical shapes, the cylindrical surface shape of free-form surface is rotationally asymmetrical and thus difficult to determine the measured position. Therefore, we processed fiducial marks on the measured sample and specified the measurement position by fiducial marks. Then we performed comparative measurements with a Fizeau interferometer using a computer generated hologram (CGH) as a reference plane. The nanoprofiler and interferometer measured to accuracies of 43.7 nm peak-to-valley (PV) and 60.9 nm PV, respectively; the difference between the two was 17.2 nm PV. Furthermore, a spherical shape and an aspherical shape were similarly measured by both devices. The spherical shape had a difference of 8.4 nm PV and that of the aspherical shape was 9.7 nm PV; thus the difference between the measurements of the cylindrical surface shape was larger. Considering that the guaranteed accuracy of CGH for measuring a cylindrical surface shape is ～30 nm PV, we concluded that this is a reasonable result and fiducial marks are effective to determine the position.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号