Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off

Jiang Ruixuan; Shaw James; Muehlbacher AxelLee Todd A.Walton SurreyKohlmann ThomasNorman RichardPickard A. Simon

首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off

【24h】

Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off

机译：Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相关主题

摘要

Objective The aim of this study was to compare online, unsupervised and face-to-face (F2F), supervised valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states using composite time trade-off (cTTO) tasks. Methods The official EuroQol experimental design and valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-5L of 86 health states were implemented in interviewer-assisted, F2F and unsupervised, online studies. Validity of preferences was assessed using prevalence of inconsistent valuations and expected patterns of TTO values. Respondent task engagement was measured using number of trade-offs and time per task. Trading patterns such as better-than-dead only was compared between modes. Value sets were generated using linear regression with a random intercept (RILR). Value set characteristics such as range of scale and dimension ranking were evaluated between modes. Results Five hundred one online and 1,134 F2F respondents completed the surveys. Mean elicited TTO values were higher online than F2F when compared by health state severity. Compared to F2F, a larger proportion of online respondents did not assign the poorest EQ-5D-5L health state (i.e., 55555) the lowest TTO value ([Online] 41.3% [F2F] 12.2%) (p < 0.001). A higher percentage of online cTTO tasks were completed in 3 trade-offs or fewer ([Online] 15.8% [F2F] 3.7%), (p < 0.001). When modeled using the RILR, the F2F range of scale was larger than online ([Online] 0.600 [F2F] 1.307) and the respective dimension rankings differed. Conclusions Compared to F2F data, TTO tasks conducted online had more inconsistencies and decreased engagement, which contributed to compromised data quality. This study illustrates the challenges of conducting online valuation studies using the TTO approach.

著录项

来源
《Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation》 |2021年第5期|1433-1444|共12页
作者
Jiang Ruixuan; Shaw James; Muehlbacher AxelLee Todd A.Walton SurreyKohlmann ThomasNorman RichardPickard A. Simon;
展开▼
作者单位

Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Syst Outcomes & Policy, Chicago, IL 60607 USA;

Med Univ Greifswald, Inst Community Med, Greifswald, Germany;

Curtin Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA, AustraliaCtr Observat & Real World Evidence, Kenilworth, NJ USABristol Myers Squibb, Patient Reported Outcomes Assessment, Princeton, NJ USAHsch Neubrandenburg, Hlth Econ & Healthcare Management, Neubrandenburg, Germany;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种英语
中图分类医药、卫生;
关键词
Time trade-off; EQ-5D; Preference elicitation; Online; Face-to-face;

Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off

摘要

著录项

相关主题

期刊订阅